Online Exclusive
Aerie No Show Cheeky Underwear
No Show means no VPLs (even in leggings). This is our most lightweight fabric, too!
Color:
Price:
Unavailable
$8.95
Reviews:
Aerie No Show Cheeky Underwear
The Details
Size & Fit
Reviews
Average Customer Ratings
Coverage:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Covers Less and 5 equals to Covers Slightly More
Fit:, 3.130653266331658 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 3.0129032258064514 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Filter Reviews
Rating
Height
Weight
Size Ordered
Locale
219 to 248 of 343 Reviews
219 – 248 of 343 Reviews
Highest to Lowest Rating
Mass
Size OrderedXS
Height5'4"
Weight120 lbs
4 out of 5 stars.
Smooth
4 years ago
I ordered a size down after reading reviews and I probably would have been fine with my normal size but they are still comfy and work very well for leggings or skinny jeans. Very smooth on skin and useful. I really like them. #AEReviewSweepsEntry
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Missouri
Size OrderedM
Height5'2"
Weight130 lbs
4 out of 5 stars.
not my “go-to”, but okay
4 years ago
#AEReviewSweepsEntry
I ordered these to replace a few of my old Victoria Secret underwear. While I’m impressed with the quality of the fabric in comparison, the size comparisons didn’t match up and the medium is a little big on me. While I can probably get away with it, I find myself having to pull them up while my pants are still up/okay.
Helpful?
Fit:, 4 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 4 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Oregon
Size OrderedM
Height5'3"
Weight180 lbs
4 out of 5 stars.
Comfy!
4 years ago
I love how soft the material of this product is! It really is seamless and extremely comfortable to wear. It does tend to slide a bit but overall super cute and great!
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Size OrderedXXS
Height5'4"
Weightunder 100 lbs
4 out of 5 stars.
Soft and comfortable
4 years ago
Fit me really well
Very comfortable
#AEReviewSweepsEntry
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Kentucky
Size OrderedXS
Height5'4"
Weight100 lbs
4 out of 5 stars.
Pretty good
4 years ago
There were no lines and it’s true to its seamless title. The only issue was though it was cheeky, it had a tendency to ride up a bit more than one would care for. #AEReviewSweepsEntry
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
KY USA
Size OrderedXL
Height5'9"
Weight190 lbs
4 out of 5 stars.
Very soft and comfy but move around a lot
5 years ago
These are soooo comfortable, however they don’t always stay in place and are a little big. #AEReviewSweepsEntry
Helpful?
Fit:, 4 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
san jose
Size OrderedS
Height5'1"
Weight110 lbs
4 out of 5 stars.
no show and comfortable
5 years ago
i think this one is slightly larger than my other smalls but it's super comfortable and feels light. I like to wear the no shows with leggings because the material is less bulky #AEReviewSweepsEntry
Helpful?
Fit:, 4 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Size OrderedXS
Height5'0"
Weightunder 100 lbs
4 out of 5 stars.
Really good
5 years ago
It doesn’t show any panty line but the material in the middle line at the back of the underwear is uncomfortable because it kinda makes a weggie but the rest is really good
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Size OrderedXS
Height5'4"
Weight110 lbs
4 out of 5 stars.
No Underwear Lines!!
5 years ago
Love these! I am normally a size small but I had to size down because I read reviews that they tend to run a little bit big. I'm am very happy with them and they do not show any underwear lines with leggings.
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Size OrderedL
Height5'5"
Weight150 lbs
3 out of 5 stars.
Fit not so great/Out $8
a year ago
I’ve ordered several panties from AE in the past two years. These are smooth and have no panty lines, but the crotch area between the front and back is so narrow. Very uncomfortable. Unfortunately since they are an intimate item, I won’t be able to return them or the two color pair in the same style.
Helpful?
Coverage:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Covers Less and 5 equals to Covers Slightly More
Size OrderedL
Height5'7"
Weight140 lbs
3 out of 5 stars.
Don’t Buy Online
2 years ago
Cute style but I bought it online and when it came in the mail, the seam that sits on the hip was crooked. Like the machine stopped cutting or something. There was a bunch of extra fabric sticking up. I don’t have the time to handle a return, that defeats the purpose of the convenience of an online order. Aerie wouldn’t replace without a return. Cute style otherwise, but just go to the store in person to make sure you don’t get a defective one.
Helpful?
Coverage:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Covers Less and 5 equals to Covers Slightly More
IL
Size OrderedS
Height5'6"
Weight130 lbs
3 out of 5 stars.
Not Enough Coverage
3 years ago
There wasn’t enough coverage. Whenever I purchased a 3 pack in store the “coverage” was an absolute joke. I don’t know who those are working for. These offered a little more but still not enough. These are not extremely uncomfortable, but not perfect either.
Helpful?
Coverage:, 1 out of 5, where 1 equals to Covers Less and 5 equals to Covers Slightly More
Size OrderedL
Height5'3"
Weight200 lbs
3 out of 5 stars.
Not worth it
4 years ago
The rise for this underwear is quite low, I feel like the material is also not super great, but I guess thats what you get for paying $5 for it. "#AEReviewSweepsEntry
Helpful?
Fit:, 2 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 2 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
West Virginia
Size OrderedS
Height5'2"
Weight130 lbs
3 out of 5 stars.
Comfortable, but a little skimpy for me
4 years ago
These panties are exactly what they say they are—they’re comfy, they’re no-show, and they almost feel like you’re not wearing anything at all. However, the cut leaves a little something to be desired, as it’s just a bit too narrow in the front. The fabric tends to shift around as you move, which wouldn’t be a problem with panties that have more coverage in the front. When I would pull my pants down for a bathroom break, I’d discover that I was partially exposed in the front because the underwear had shifted off to one side. It’s not that they were too small, either, as I wear the same size in all my aerie panties, and my cotton cheekies don’t have this issue.
In short, if you’re used to narrow panties and high-leg bikini underwear, or like to go commando, these underwear are going to be your favorites. If you prefer full coverage and live in boyshorts and boybriefs like me, these might be best saved for leggings day. #AEReviewSweepsEntry
Helpful?
Fit:, 2 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Size OrderedL
Height5'3"
Weight190 lbs
3 out of 5 stars.
I mean, eh
4 years ago
Idk the fabric seems kinda cheap… Also, they don’t really stay in place they kinda just roll down but hike up in other parts. They’re cute don’t get me wrong, but if you don’t want something that feels like you can get it at the dollar store then pass.
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 2 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Bergen, nj
Size OrderedXXL
Height5'7"
Weight230 lbs
3 out of 5 stars.
Feels cheap
4 years ago
these undies feel thin and cheap. But I guess that's the purpose of 'no show '. I wouldn't buy these again. The only reason I bought them is because they were super cheap on clearance. They are very comfortable though.
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 2 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
MO
Size OrderedXL
3 out of 5 stars.
Major Wedgies
4 years ago
I am not a cheeky underwear person by any means but I figured I would give these a go. They are super soft and stretchy. My biggest concern is that they will stretch out. I had them on for two seconds and they were already in the most uncomfortable wedge, I'll pass next time. #AEReviewSweepsEntry
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Marine, IL
Size OrderedL
Height5'2"
Weight160 lbs
3 out of 5 stars.
Very comfy, but not for me
4 years ago
Super comfy and good for no show but they ride up and down there kind of gets a wedgie. Which is very uncomfortable as you can probably imagine. Would definitely not buy again.
Helpful?
Fit:, 4 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 5 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Size OrderedS
3 out of 5 stars.
Unsure about these
4 years ago
I'm a bit unsure about these. They fit true to size for me, and they are super comfortable and sleek. But I accidentally sent them through the dryer, and now they look a bit worse for wear. I'm not sure they would be "seamless" anymore because they are a bit scrunched and wrinkled up. I would buy again, but definitely not machine dry them! #AEReviewSweepsEntry
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Ottawa, ON
Size OrderedM
Height5'5"
Weight150 lbs
3 out of 5 stars.
Not great.
4 years ago
I bought these to wear under leggings, as I have the same style from other stores. However, I didn't really like these ones. They fit me fine (I got my usual size for underwear, medium) but the crotch area fabric is not very wide, so it doesn't cover you and rides up a lot. Also the material is not very soft or stretchy, which is what I like for underwear. Ended up throwing out after a few uses, which is a disappointment because I really love Aerie/ American Eagle stuff and this is my first disappointment from them.
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Size OrderedXXL
Height5'6"
Weight210 lbs
3 out of 5 stars.
Comfy but not
4 years ago
I ordered a few pairs of this style, and they super soft and comfy for the most part. I just wish the main part that needs covered with this underwear was a bit wider, ya know.
Helpful?
Fit:, 4 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Size OrderedXS
3 out of 5 stars.
good no show
4 years ago
It is truly no show, and is great for leggings and thin materials. I expected it ride up when I bought it; they definitely do. They are so uncomfortable, the wedgie I get is unreal. Just buy the no show thong this is basically the same thing. #AEReviewSweepsEntry
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Rise:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Lower than Expected and 5 equals to Higher than Expected
Minneapolis
Size OrderedXS
Height5'2"
Weight100 lbs
3 out of 5 stars.
Wish there was a a boy brief version...
5 years ago
The no-show undies are great for wearing with leggings. Aerie used to make them in the boy brief cut and I wish they’d bring that back! These cheeky cut undies are just OK - unfortunately they ride up more easily. I’ve found they actually ride up in the front when doing squats and lunges which is super uncomfortable :( either the crotch isn’t wide enough or the upward angle (cheeky cut) pulls them up too much #AEReviewSweepsEntry
Helpful?
Fit:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Runs Small and 5 equals to Runs Large
Size OrderedM
Height5'0"
Weight140 lbs
2 out of 5 stars.
Absolutely no front coverage
2 years ago
I want to love these, but there’s not much about them that I do. The fabric is great, but I cannot wear them because I am ALWAYS getting an uncomfortable front wedgie. The crotch area is so narrow. I thought it was because I was wearing the wrong size, so I sized up. However, I still have the same problem. I hope they fix these because I love aerie and would much rather order here than VS.
Helpful?
Coverage:, 1 out of 5, where 1 equals to Covers Less and 5 equals to Covers Slightly More
Height5'3"
Weight150 lbs
2 out of 5 stars.
Fit is not right
2 years ago
I love the style of these underwear, you can't see the lines under clothing which is exactly what I was looking for. They're very comfortable besides the fact that it's a little skinny in the private area...I find myself having to readjust many times throughout the day. I only wear these when I have to because it does not fit correctly in the are where it needs to the most.
Helpful?
Coverage:, 2 out of 5, where 1 equals to Covers Less and 5 equals to Covers Slightly More
Height5'2"
2 out of 5 stars.
made for polly pocket privates
2 years ago
unfortunately the bottom portion is only half an inch wide. for reference i am petite and prefer cheeky underwear but these panties were a new level of lack of coverage. even just sleeping or sitting down they slip and slide around
Helpful?
Coverage:, 1 out of 5, where 1 equals to Covers Less and 5 equals to Covers Slightly More
Size OrderedS
2 out of 5 stars.
2 years ago
they used to use cotton for this style a long time ago and I wish they still did because they were way more comfortable, this fabric isn’t terrible it just isn’t breathable and it’s cheaper quality then when they had the Cotten ones. Probably wouldn’t buy again unless the switch back to the cotton ones.
Helpful?
Portland, OR
Size OrderedM
Height5'8"
Weight130 lbs
2 out of 5 stars.
No Crotch Coverage
2 years ago
Pros: Fabric feels great on the skin, and they do not show up under pants and dresses.
Cons: The crotch area does not provide coverage and it all bunches up on one side with the rest exposed. It's so uncomfortable, and I didn't realize it would do that until after wearing them around. Now I can't return them. I do not recommend these.
Helpful?
Coverage:, 2 out of 5, where 1 equals to Covers Less and 5 equals to Covers Slightly More
TN
Size OrderedM
Height5'8"
Weight150 lbs
2 out of 5 stars.
Bring back the COTTON no-show cheeky underwear
2 years ago
So much prefer the COTTON version of this underwear. Healthier as well.
Helpful?
Coverage:, 3 out of 5, where 1 equals to Covers Less and 5 equals to Covers Slightly More
2 out of 5 stars.
Different
3 years ago
I bought no show panties from aerie in the thong about a year ago and they were so soft and truely no show.. these showed up and look and feel like cheap plastic. I haven't tried them on yet.. they seem very stretchy and im sure will not show through my leggings, but I was really disappointed in the material.
Helpful?
219 – 248 of 343 Reviews